A sideswipe accident can leave both drivers telling completely different stories. One driver says the other vehicle drifted into the lane. The other insists the exact opposite happened. When there is no obvious rear-end impact or clear intersection violation, determining fault can become difficult.
Minton Law Firm helps people injured in Arkansas car accidents investigate what actually happened rather than relying solely on competing driver statements. In a disputed sideswipe claim, damage patterns, video, witnesses, roadway markings, electronic evidence, and the vehicles' positions may provide a clearer picture of which driver crossed the lane line.
Arkansas law generally requires a vehicle to remain within a single lane and prohibits moving from that lane until the driver has first determined that the movement can be made safely. When two motorists disagree about who violated that duty, the evidence becomes critical.
A sideswipe collision occurs when the sides of two vehicles make contact while traveling next to or near one another.
Unlike a head-on or rear-end crash, the initial contact may occur at a relatively shallow angle. Damage can extend along doors, mirrors, fenders, quarter panels, wheels, or other areas on the sides of the vehicles.
Common scenarios include:
Some sideswipes remain relatively minor. Others cause a driver to lose control, leave the roadway, strike another vehicle, or collide with a barrier.
There is no automatic rule that one particular driver is responsible for every sideswipe.
The key question is generally which driver's movement caused the vehicles to make contact.
Arkansas Code § 27-51-302 states that a vehicle on a roadway with clearly marked traffic lanes should be driven as nearly as practical entirely within a single lane and should not move from that lane until the driver has first determined that the movement can be made safely.
If Driver A changes lanes and strikes Driver B, who was already established in the neighboring lane, evidence may support assigning fault to Driver A.
But the facts can be less straightforward. Driver A may begin a lawful lane change while Driver B simultaneously drifts toward the same lane. Both drivers could potentially contribute to the collision.
That is why identifying the movement of each vehicle before impact is so important.
A driver preparing to change lanes should determine that the neighboring lane is clear before moving over.
Sideswipe accidents can happen when a driver:
A driver saying, "I never saw the other car," does not necessarily resolve responsibility. The investigation should determine whether the vehicle was there to be seen and whether a reasonable check of the surrounding traffic would have revealed it.
Merging creates another common sideswipe scenario.
One vehicle may be entering an interstate or highway while another is already traveling in the through lane. In heavier traffic, a through driver may also be changing lanes at approximately the same time.
The investigation may need to determine:
Video can be especially useful because the final resting positions may not show how the vehicles were moving several seconds earlier.
Not every sideswipe involves an intentional lane change.
A driver looking at a phone, adjusting navigation, interacting with a passenger, or otherwise becoming distracted may gradually drift across a lane marking without realizing it.
Fatigue, impairment, or inattention can create similar movement.
When one driver says, "They drifted into me," while the other makes the same accusation, evidence beyond the drivers' recollections becomes particularly important.
This is often the central issue in a disputed sideswipe accident.
No single piece of evidence necessarily provides the answer. Instead, investigators may compare several sources to reconstruct how the vehicles moved before and during impact.
The location and direction of damage can help establish how the vehicles came together.
Investigators may examine:
For example, damage concentrated near one vehicle's front corner and extending along the side of another vehicle may support a different sequence than parallel scraping along both vehicles.
Damage should be interpreted together with the other evidence rather than treated as conclusive by itself.
Paint, rubber, and other material can transfer between vehicles during a sideswipe.
The location of that transfer can help identify the areas that made contact and potentially assist in reconstructing the collision.
Take detailed photographs before either vehicle is repaired.
A dashcam can provide particularly valuable evidence when both motorists claim they stayed within their lanes.
Video may show:
Rear-facing or side-facing cameras can sometimes provide additional information beyond a standard forward-facing dashcam.
A driver behind the two vehicles may have had a better view of the collision than either person involved.
Witnesses can potentially describe which vehicle moved first, whether a turn signal was used, whether one driver appeared to be drifting, and where the vehicles were positioned relative to the lane markings.
Obtain witness contact information at the scene whenever possible.
A sideswipe may be captured by:
Potential video should be identified quickly because private systems may overwrite recordings.
Where the vehicles stop can provide clues, but final positions do not necessarily establish where the initial contact occurred.
Drivers may steer, brake, or move considerable distances after impact.
Investigators should compare final positions with debris, scrape marks, vehicle damage, photographs, and other evidence from the roadway.
If distracted driving is genuinely suspected, cellphone evidence may become relevant.
Obtaining detailed phone records generally requires appropriate legal process and justification. The mere fact that a driver possessed a cellphone does not establish distraction.
When legally available, relevant records may help determine whether phone activity occurred around the time of the crash.
A serious sideswipe involving catastrophic injuries, multiple impacts, or strongly disputed liability may justify accident reconstruction.
A reconstruction specialist may evaluate vehicle damage, roadway measurements, tire marks, video, electronic vehicle information, photographs, and other physical evidence to determine the likely movement of the vehicles.
Conflicting statements are common in sideswipe claims.
An insurance adjuster may initially conclude that liability cannot be established when each driver gives an opposing version and there is little independent evidence.
That does not mean the investigation should end.
The vehicles themselves may contain useful physical evidence. A dashcam may have recorded the crash. A nearby business may have surveillance footage. Another motorist may have witnessed the lane movement.
This is why documenting the scene and vehicles immediately after a disputed sideswipe can be particularly valuable.
No. A police investigation can provide useful information, but the report should not automatically be treated as the final determination of civil liability.
The report may document statements, vehicle positions, witnesses, citations, diagrams, and the officer's observations. Arkansas State Police maintains the state's central repository for crash reports, including records prepared by local and county law enforcement agencies.
Arkansas law also places restrictions on the use of required accident reports as evidence in trials arising from an accident.
For an injury claim, fault should be evaluated using the complete available evidence rather than assuming that one box, diagram, or statement in the crash report settles the issue.
Yes.
Consider a situation where Driver A begins changing from the left lane into the right lane without adequately checking the blind spot. At the same time, Driver B is distracted and has begun drifting from the right lane toward the left.
The vehicles collide near the lane line.
Evidence could potentially support a finding that both drivers contributed to the accident.
Arkansas's comparative-fault law becomes important in cases like this.
Arkansas Code § 16-64-122 uses a modified comparative-fault framework for claims involving personal injury, wrongful death, and property damage based on fault.
If the injured person's degree of fault is less than the fault attributed to the party or parties from whom compensation is sought, damages can be recovered but are reduced according to the injured person's percentage of fault. If the claimant's fault is equal to or greater than the relevant fault of the party or parties from whom recovery is sought, the statute bars recovery.
For example, assume a driver suffers $100,000 in recoverable damages but is found 20% responsible for the sideswipe. The damages would generally be reduced by that percentage, leaving $80,000 before other legal or insurance issues are considered.
This is why arguments over lane position can have a direct effect on compensation.
A sideswipe with conflicting driver accounts creates an obvious liability dispute for insurers.
The other driver's insurer may argue:
Your own insurer may also become involved depending on your coverage and the circumstances.
Justin Minton's background as a former insurance adjuster gives Minton Law Firm insight into how insurers evaluate disputed accident claims and the evidence they use when deciding whether to accept or deny liability.
If you can do so safely:
A few photographs showing the lane configuration and precise damage may become extremely important when the drivers later give conflicting accounts.
For more information about protecting an injury claim, see Minton Law Firm's Arkansas Car Accident Lawyer page. If several vehicles became involved after the initial sideswipe, see Multi-Vehicle Accidents in Arkansas: How Is Fault Determined When Several Drivers Are Involved?.
Depending on the circumstances and severity of the injuries, compensation may include:
A sideswipe can also trigger a much more serious secondary collision. A vehicle may spin into traffic, strike a barrier, leave the roadway, or become involved in a multi-vehicle crash.
The amount of visible side damage alone does not necessarily establish the severity of someone's injuries.
Fault must be determined from the available evidence. Vehicle damage, paint transfer, dashcam footage, witnesses, roadway evidence, nearby cameras, and other information may help establish which vehicle moved from its lane.
No. Damage location can provide useful evidence, but it should be evaluated together with vehicle movement, lane position, video, witnesses, and the overall collision sequence.
The claim can still be investigated. Vehicle damage, photographs, paint transfer, dashcam footage, nearby surveillance video, electronic information, and roadway evidence may help reconstruct what occurred.
Yes. If both motorists made unsafe movements that contributed to the collision, fault can potentially be shared. Arkansas comparative-fault rules determine how an injured person's own percentage of responsibility affects recovery.
Do not assume that ends the claim. A crash report can be important investigative evidence, but civil liability should be evaluated using all available evidence. Arkansas law also limits the use of required accident reports as evidence at trial.
Make sure the damage has been thoroughly photographed and documented before repairs. In a serious case where liability is heavily disputed, consider whether the vehicle may need to be inspected before it is altered.
The driver who initiated the sideswipe may potentially be responsible for injuries and damage resulting from the subsequent collision if the evidence establishes the necessary causal connection. Additional drivers may also bear responsibility depending on what occurred.
When both drivers blame each other, the outcome should not depend solely on which person tells the more confident story. Physical evidence, video, witnesses, roadway markings, and vehicle damage may provide a more reliable account of how the collision happened.
Minton Law Firm can investigate a disputed sideswipe accident, evaluate the available evidence, communicate with insurers, and determine how Arkansas comparative-fault rules may affect your claim. Call Minton Law Firm at 501-794-0001 today for a free consultation. There is no attorney fee unless we win compensation for you.
"*" indicates required fields
